This is a truly fantastic idea. If the State is going to claim a “legitimate state interest” in defining marriage exclusively for the purpose of procreation and child-rearing and go on to use this interest to declare that same-sex couples are properly barred from marriage because they are incapable of procreating, then they should have to lie in the bed they have so messily made, so to speak.
If same-sex couples should be barred from marriage because they can not have children together, it follows that all couples who can not or will not have children together should equally be barred from marriage.
I amparticularly amused by the stipulation that
couples married out of state file proof of procreation within three years of the date of marriage or have their marriage classed as “unrecognized;”
I still think that the answer is to make heterosexual (along with homosexual) marriage unconstitutional, since clearly it de-emphasizes the commercial nature of normal human interaction, and is a major impediment to the commercial growth of prostitution. The market can solve all problems and meet all needs more efficiently, right?