<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Desktop Linux is Ready To Go</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/</link>
	<description>part of the problem since 1976</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linux Myth Dispeller - A Linux World Net Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Is Desktop Linux Missing?</title>
		<link>http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Myth Dispeller - A Linux World Net Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Is Desktop Linux Missing?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/#comment-4261</guid>
		<description>[...] The comments on my previous post about desktop Linux have gotten me thinking about what exactly desktop Linux needs in order to succeed. From where I sit, the big factors are: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The comments on my previous post about desktop Linux have gotten me thinking about what exactly desktop Linux needs in order to succeed. From where I sit, the big factors are: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: new2linuxguy</title>
		<link>http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/#comment-4260</link>
		<dc:creator>new2linuxguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 02:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/#comment-4260</guid>
		<description>What about us regular computer users that simply want something that will work without having to be a programer specialist to get things like DVD players to "just work" or to figure out how to play audio etc. I hate the windows empire, but just don't know enough about Linux to be fully 11% gung-ho about it as I'd like to be.

I have Xandros which I was told would be a great halfway house between the windows stuff and that of Linux. I can't play DVDs - it just gives me the FBI warning again and again. I have heard this is something to do with copyright laws? So I can't play DVD's at all even though I purchased them legitimately and didn't just DL them or such.

One can't play .wma files which a great many sites that have bands audio available to sample use. That bites...

I am told you can program your iPod to work with it just fine, though no one I know has ever done this or heard exactly how you do it.

My computer has miss-assigned the wrong audio card as well for some reason when installing Xandros. It tells me I have one thing when the person who built it for me says it is another entirely, even though he is familiar with linux, he says he's never even gotten behind a Xandros desktop and has no idea how to change this.

These are the issues I have with my linux desktop and are what stops me from being really gung-ho about it. Though I'd love to be. Simply put, I have only half a computer it seems like, and Xandros was one version I was told is almost entirely 'ready to go'.. So much for that. Do I just need to find another version of Linux that is easier to manage in these regards, or are they all the same, i.e. none of them play dvd's, wma's, etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about us regular computer users that simply want something that will work without having to be a programer specialist to get things like <acronym title="Digital Versatile Disc">DVD</acronym> players to &#8220;just work&#8221; or to figure out how to play audio etc. I hate the windows empire, but just don&#8217;t know enough about Linux to be fully 11% gung-ho about it as I&#8217;d like to be.</p>
<p>I have Xandros which I was told would be a great halfway house between the windows stuff and that of Linux. I can&#8217;t play DVDs - it just gives me the <acronym title="Federal Bureau of Investigation">FBI</acronym> warning again and again. I have heard this is something to do with copyright laws? So I can&#8217;t play <acronym title="Digital Versatile Disc">DVD</acronym>&#8217;s at all even though I purchased them legitimately and didn&#8217;t just DL them or such.</p>
<p>One can&#8217;t play .wma files which a great many sites that have bands audio available to sample use. That bites&#8230;</p>
<p>I am told you can program your iPod to work with it just fine, though no one I know has ever done this or heard exactly how you do it.</p>
<p>My computer has miss-assigned the wrong audio card as well for some reason when installing Xandros. It tells me I have one thing when the person who built it for me says it is another entirely, even though he is familiar with linux, he says he&#8217;s never even gotten behind a Xandros desktop and has no idea how to change this.</p>
<p>These are the issues I have with my linux desktop and are what stops me from being really gung-ho about it. Though I&#8217;d love to be. Simply put, I have only half a computer it seems like, and Xandros was one version I was told is almost entirely &#8216;ready to go&#8217;.. So much for that. Do I just need to find another version of Linux that is easier to manage in these regards, or are they all the same, i.e. none of them play dvd&#8217;s, wma&#8217;s, etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/#comment-4259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 18:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jontillman.com/2006/05/16/myth-desktop-linux-is-ready-to-go/#comment-4259</guid>
		<description>This is very true. When my curious friends ask me if they should switch to Linux, I give them an honest answer based upon what I think their technical skill level and tolerance for 'mucking about' is.

I've always felt that there are two groups of people that will enjoy desktop Linux: computer enthusiasts who care about their computer and infrequent computer users who don't give a rat's @ss about their computer. Those two groups will do well.

Anyone else is probably not going to enjoy desktop Linux very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very true. When my curious friends ask me if they should switch to Linux, I give them an honest answer based upon what I think their technical skill level and tolerance for &#8216;mucking about&#8217; is.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always felt that there are two groups of people that will enjoy desktop Linux: computer enthusiasts who care about their computer and infrequent computer users who don&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s @ss about their computer. Those two groups will do well.</p>
<p>Anyone else is probably not going to enjoy desktop Linux very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
